Change message for unknown deploys
under review
Stakepire
With the current blocktime of ~30s and the release of the recent DEX which links to deploys it would be useful to change the current message of:
Nothing was found
Try to search again using the search bar above
To something like:
Nothing was found
It can take up to ~1 minute until deploys are shown here.
Try to search again later and make sure the deploy hash is correct.
The current message could confuse people if they don't know about that delay.
Just a very rough idea of the message but I hope the idea is clear.
Muhammet Kara
Stakepire Pending deploys from external sources are now also shown on cspr.live. Do you think this is still relevant?
Stakepire
Muhammet Kara: I didn't try it with a pending deploy yet but it seems that non-existent hashes are shown as "Unknown" and as an account hash -> that seems very confusing to me.
So yes, I think this is still relevant and could need some improvement because I've copied a deploy and modified 1 character only and it gets detected as an "Unknown account hash".
This is the original successful Deploy I've checked:
https://cspr.live/deploy/8b97361e7720648f26a42e3ce58cc5097131abcc33dbc38c95822b991877252f
I've changed the last "f" to an "e" - not sure if that is a valid test though.
I did another test:
Testing it with a random wallet it is also just showing 0 balance -> I would expect a message like "Wallet doesn't exist. If it's your wallet make at least 1 transfer to this wallet to see the balance" or something like that because according to my knowledge a wallet which never received any CSPR doesn't exist yet.
Original random wallet:
https://cspr.live/account/0202c225c07b38a7ca00d8dc4118c2f76a9ece8fdf8af669245ade984b6a4e7b8662
I've changed the last "1" to a "2".
The "Named Keys" shows an error message for non-existing wallets btw. (see attached screenshot). So if this was done for security and/or against any kind of scraping protection - it failed.
Without testing on my side I would assume the same applies to some other hashes/urefs etc. as well.
![](https://canny.io/images/5aec964699e632e4d88fa466e0ff6f73.png)
![](https://canny.io/images/a42d58dc1b0eef7ff9abe5f0f455fd86.png)
M
Michael Steuer
under review
Thanks for the suggestion, great idea!